Monday February 12th 2007, 11:50 pm
How many of our readers have accepted the scaremonger propaganda of the professional armageddon pedlars of global warming and that the end is nigh? Believe me, it’s the greatest load of old fashioned bulldust ever that keeps rearing its ugly looney head every century or so.
[News Source]
GLOBAL WARMING? Climate Change? Bulldust! (Weekly Times)
Stern warns Bush over global warming (Independent)
Monday February 12th 2007, 7:13 pm
Sir Nicholas Stern, senior advisor to the British government on the economic impact of climate change, will today warn the Bush administration that America must act now to confront global warming.
[News Source]
Canada sets 1.28 billion dollars to fight climate change (AFP via Yahoo! News)
Monday February 12th 2007, 12:38 pm
Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced a fund worth 1.5 billion dollars (1.28 billion US) to fight climate change through various domestic efforts.
[News Source]
GOP still cool on global warming (Las Vegas Sun)
Monday February 12th 2007, 11:19 am
WASHINGTON - When President Bush spoke for the first time in a State of the Union speech about the need to "confront the serious challenge of global climate change," environmentalists celebrated something of a turnaround for the Republican Party - which had put a senator who called global warming a "hoax" in charge of the Senate environmental committee.
[News Source]
Bush team changes its tune on global warming (Provo Daily Herald)
Monday February 12th 2007, 5:11 am
WASHINGTON -- President Bush is considered to be one of the world's most prominent skeptics of global warming. But to hear White House officials tell it, the world's view of him is wrong. In recent days, White House officials have made a special effort to claim that Bush always has been concerned about climate change.
[News Source]
Global-warming skeptics cite being ‘treated like a pariah’ (The Washington Times)
Monday February 12th 2007, 12:16 am
Scientists skeptical of climate-change theories say they are increasingly coming under attack -- treatment that may make other analysts less likely to present contrarian views about global warming.
[News Source]